As the end of the tax year approaches, business owners considering an exit are facing a rapidly changing tax landscape. For directors of solvent companies, a Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL) remains one of the most effective ways to extract retained profits in a tax‑efficient manner. However, recent and forthcoming Capital Gains Tax (CGT) increases mean that timing is now a critical strategic consideration.
With CGT rates on qualifying business disposals rising by a further 4%, proactive exit planning ahead of the tax year end could make a material difference to the net proceeds received by shareholders.
What Is an MVL?
A Members’ Voluntary Liquidation is a formal, solvent liquidation process used to close a company that can pay all its debts in full, together with statutory interest, within 12 months. Once liabilities are settled, surplus funds are distributed to shareholders, typically treated as capital rather than income for tax purposes.
This capital treatment is what makes MVLs particularly attractive. Instead of distributions being taxed as dividends, they may qualify for CGT and, where conditions are met, Business Asset Disposal Relief (BADR).
BADR and the Changing CGT Landscape
BADR has historically allowed qualifying gains to be taxed at a reduced CGT rate of 10%, subject to a lifetime limit of £1 million. While that rate is now firmly in the past, the relief still offers a meaningful advantage compared with income tax and dividend tax rates.
Following the Autumn Budget 2024, the government confirmed a phased increase in the CGT rate applying to BADR:
This represents a 4% increase for disposals falling into the 2025/26 tax year, and a further 4% rise the year after.
For many owner‑managed businesses, the difference between a 14% and 18% CGT rate is far from academic. On a £1 million qualifying gain, that additional 4% equates to £40,000 in extra tax.
Why the Tax Year End Is a Natural Decision Point
The UK tax year end on 5 April has always been a natural point to review remuneration and exit strategies before this date. In the current environment, it has taken on even greater significance.
For shareholders already contemplating a solvent wind‑down:
While anti‑forestalling rules exist to prevent purely tax‑driven transactions, HMRC guidance confirms that commercially driven MVLs remain legitimate where a company has genuinely ceased trading.
MVLs as Part of a Wider Exit Plan
An MVL should never be viewed as a last‑minute tax tactic. It is most effective when used as part of a broader exit planning strategy, aligned with the commercial reality of the business.
Common scenarios include:
In these cases, an MVL can provide clarity, finality, and tax efficiency—provided the process is planned and executed correctly.
The Importance of Early Professional Advice
Given the interaction between insolvency law, tax legislation, and HMRC’s anti‑avoidance framework, early advice is essential. Directors should engage with:
Importantly, BADR is not automatic. Qualifying conditions around shareholdings, trading status, and ownership periods must all be met.
Looking Ahead
The direction of travel is clear: capital taxes on business exits are increasing, not decreasing. While MVLs remain a powerful exit tool, their effectiveness is sensitive to timing.
As the tax year end approaches and the next CGT increase looms, business owners with surplus cash locked inside solvent companies would be well advised to review their position now. In many cases, acting sooner rather than later could preserve tens of thousands of pounds in value, while bringing a clean and orderly conclusion to the corporate journey.
Early Action is Key
Post articles and opinions on Surrey Professionals
to attract new clients and referrals. Feature in newsletters.
Join for free today and upload your articles for new contacts to read and enquire further.